Continued Rise of Evils identified as Culprits of the 2008 Crash

1. In 2008, in the wake of the financial crisis, assets under management in so-called "retail alternative funds" in the US [a.k.a. alternative investments, and defined to include absolute return, commodities, currency trading, dedicated short bias, equity energy, leveraged strategies (both long and inverse), managed futures, market neutral, multi-strategy alternatives, natural resources, options arbitrage, precious metals, real estate and volatility strategies; but to exclude distressed debt] crashed in the US from $368Bn to $275Bn. However, as a percentage of "all long term retail fund AUM" [defined to include mutual funds, closed-end funds, ETFs and UCITs (Undertakings for Collective Investments in Securities) structures, and excludes limited partnerships and separately managed accounts], it never fell - indeed, the figure of $275Bn in 2008 was 5% of LT Retail Fund AUM in 2008 whereas the bigger figure of $368Bn was 4% of the same figure in 2007. 
2. From 2009, the share of alternative investments as a percentage of the all long term retail fund AUM started rising once again, boht, in the US, and globally excluding the USand they have been growing @21% CAGR in absolute terms in the US, and at 11% globally excluding the US;  till 2011.
3. At the same time, several other disturbing parameters have been heading in the "wrong" direction. See the table below, which shows these statistics as they stood  at three different times I have tracked them in my blog. 
4. Reading this table closely shows that the average American is on the right path (reduced personal debt per citizen; higher GDP per citizen) but the US Government has continued its profligacy with a vengeance (rise in National Debt as % of GDP; Total Debt per Citizen; and US Debt held by Foreign Countries). Just look at the US Total Liabilities and US Interest Burden per citizen from April, 2010 to September, 2011 to see what havoc the US fiscal and monetary policies are wreaking.   
5. What is worse, the investment bankers are back with a vengeance: as paras 1. and 2. above indicate, and as the figure of Currency and Credit Derivatives in the Table below confirm, what Warren Buffett famously termed as Weapons of Financial Mass Destruction are growing in value at an uncomfortable pace.  Derivative exposures have risen by as much as $91 Trillion (or 6.37 times the US GDP in just 30 months), when they should have been falling! 
6. It is time that the US Investment bankers are stopped from selling "innovative" risk-masking derivative products - for the sake of the financial health of the entire world.

Table 1

Parameter	8 Apr 10	26 Jul 11	11 Sep 12
US National Debt as % of US GDP	89%	98%	104%
US National Debt per citizen ($):	41,381	46,619	50,959
US GDP per citizen ($):	46,381	47,488	48,805
US Total Debt per citizen ($):	1,80,484	1,76,113	1,81,307
US Personal Debt per citizen ($):	53,787	51,441	50,132
US Interest Burden per citizen ($):	1,493	11,664	12,343
US Total Assets per citizen ($):	2,34,181	2,43,086	2,96,124
US Total Liabilities per citizen ($):	3,50,054	10,26,974	10,54,522
US Gross Domestic Product ($):	14.333 Tr	14.809 Tr	15.342 Tr
US Debt held by Foreign Countries ($):	3.875 Tr	4.584 Tr	5.376 Tr
Currency and Credit Derivatives ($):	648.975 Tr	611.499 Tr	740.277 Tr

Sources of data: 

Para 1 and 2 above: from "The Mainstreaming of Alternative Investments - Fueling the Next Wave of Growth in Asset Management", a Report by the Financial Services Practice of McKinsey & Co, Sep 2012.

Para 3 : extracted on 11 Sep, 2012 from www.usdebtclock.org,

Table 1 above: extracted on dates mentioned in cols 2-4 of table 1 from www.usdebtclock.org,  

Global Power Shift

This is just a series of observations that support my idea that we are living in what, in a few decades, will be seen as tumultous times.

Recently, there was a news item that stated that by 2020, China will become a larger economy than the US; and by 2050, India will top even China, leaving the US a distant third. This is not someone's wishful thinking, but just the magic of compounding – of economic growth, rather than of your money in a bank.

Today, we are all living at the crossroads of history. A subtle power shift, significantly visible in time frames of decades, but barely perceptible at the time frame level of a day or a week, is happening all the time. Witness the following:

• The Arab Spring happened over a period of months and still seems dramatic. I doubt if the spring has completely spent itself. It is not yet all cool in Syria and Egypt, and it may yet erupt again in some other nation(s).
• Technology laughs at national and geographic borders. Accountability and clean governance pressures were earlier driven within each nation's power centres, laterally. However, now there are vertical pressures that cross national borders earily – thanks to telecom, internet, satellite broadcasting and global moneychangers (both, traders and speculators).
• Unregulated or unpoliced space soon becomes populated with groups that thrive on chaos and absence of regulation. Witness Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, etc. to see the truth of this.
• Unregulated pockets in otherwise regulated economies also give birth to chaos. While this is not to be taken as an approval of the concept of a police state, it is sobering to hear Paddy Ashdown cite a fact that 60% of the $4M that funded the 9/11 bombings passed through the WTC itself!
• Now, the enemy is within each country. Thus, for properly defending a country, the defence ministry may need to speak to the Health ministry (to protect against pandemics); Ministry of Commerce and Industry (the hi-tech infrastructure of the country is sensitive and vulnerable to attack), Home Affairs (to track infiltrators), and Transportation (Air/ ship/ road security). Defending our borders is just not enough.
• The maximum vulnerability is at all “interconnection points” (airports, docks, bus and train terminals). So defending at such points necessarily means overlap in responsibilities and powers. Hence, working with others efficiently is a capability all need to develop.
• Defence co-operation is not enough. Nations and people living in them need to realize that war is an immensely expensive zero-sum game that can go on infintely to their collective detriment. Only then can long-festering disputes cool down sufficiently to permit normal life.
• In 1945, when WW-II ended, there were about 100 countries. Today, there are nearly 200. We are adding almost 1.5 new  countries a year on an average over the last 67 years.  At the same, time, we have witnessed European countries lowering the borders and becoming a single currency area (that initiative is arguably in the endgame stage already).
• Siberia has such inclement weather that in the Far East province of Russia (area double of India) less than 60 Lakh people live. Greater Mumbai has double that population! However, it is a source of power for Russia – most of its natural gas and oil is sourced from this vast area. Surprisingly, this is a source of power for China too! Global warming has given rise to vast wheat fields in Siberia – but there is no one in Russia to feed. Russia's population is shrinking. But we see that some 600,000 Chinese migrate to Siberia, cultivate wheat during the summer on vast leased farm tracts, and come back home every year. This wheat feeds a good proportion of the Chinese population.
• China is controlling a larger and larger part of the world – without firing a shot. They are, quite literally, either buying them up, or colonizing through sheer numbers of immigrants. They are “partnering for prosperity” with several poorer countries, notably in Africa. Thereby, it is creating a China-centric circle of influence that rivals that of the US already. China has trade relationships with Korea, Japan and other countries in the neighborhood, and lower tariffs for poorer countries. In Singapore, Vietnam and Malaysia, the ethnic Chinese population is a significant, loosely united power bloc. In BRICS and in the Asian Free Trade Zone, China is assuming an increasingly dominant role. For example, on Iran, both China and Russia have vetoed UN Resolutions sponsored by the US for increased sanctions. China is still the largest customer of Iranian oil, with India being second.
• Chinese yuan is threatens to emerge as an alternative reserve currency in addition to the dollar and euro, which (when, not if, China can get away with it) will deflate the US balloon much faster than one can imagine. When that happens, the US will be awash (not overnight, but over a finite period of, say, 3 years) with inflation of  the trillion dollars of bonds that China won't need. Thus, the US seems poised to deteriorate as a global power. Inflation robs from the poor, and shifts even more economic power to the rich, so it will exacerbate social tensions in the US, as the feeling is already rife that the US bends backwards to accommodate the rich, at the cost of the poor. The recent BRICS meet discussed this concept, but shied away from pushing immediately for it. If, and when, yuan gets adopted as an alternative reserve currency, the power shift will accelerate.

I intend to develop this line of thinking further in coming days and weeks. I welcome inputs in the form of comments from anyone who has more to contribute to this line of thinking.

Dysprosium

No, it is not something bad, like dysfunctional or dyslexia. It is not a medicine either. A few of us, barring chemistry freaks, may know this from the Periodic Table of Elements, part of a group called Lanthanides. It is an element, like Iron, or Copper. Except that the world manufactures (from natural ores) only about 100 tonnes per annum of this substance. So it is rarer than gold, literally speaking. But strangely, currently worth much less than its weight in gold, at close to $2,500 per kg. Gold is many, many times costlier. So what?

China makes 99 tonnes out of that 100 tonnes. So what? China has restricted its export, along with a clutch of similar improbably named elements collectively called as rare earth metals. China has only 12 years' worth of output (estimated) left in the clay mines that are the source of the ore. Naturally, China wants to conserve its reserves for its own use, and have clamped export limits. The United States, as always, wants China to ease these export restrictions, going to the extent of filing a WTO complaint against China.

Strangely, China has 35% of world reserves but accounts for 97% of current world production of rare earth metal oxides! And guess what, USA has significant rare earth reserves (1/3^rd of China's according to the figures put out by the US Geological Survey's Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2010 ) that it is currently not exploiting at all. Indeed, the report notes that “Bastnäsite deposits in China and the United States constitute the largest percentage of the world’s rare-earth economic resources ”. Molycorp Minerals, a mining company, is even as I write this, engaged in a fight with the US Government to get one of its mines re-opened, lying closed since 2002. Australia and the CIS countries also have significant reserves that are currently almost not utilised at all. Why so? The answer may lie in the genesis of the name: Dysprosium is derived from the Greek “dysprositos” that means hard-to-get-at!

Toyota requires 100 grammes per car of this substance to make the drive motors for its hybrid car, Prius. The entire world's current output would be sufficient for only a million hybrid cars. But then, they are not the only guys vying for the substance.

It is used in almost all mobile phones, flat screen TVs and computer monitors, nuclear reactor fuel rods, magnetomechanical sensors, actuators, automotive catalytic converters, high-precision liquid fuel injectors and acoustic and ultrasonic transducers (don't worry about what some of these things are or do – suffice it to say that they generate demand for Dysprosium). Wind power generators require it, as do hard disks. High-intensity commercial lighting and lasers use an alloy including this.

Can we manufacture it synthetically? Not yet! So the world has no alternative to focus on commercializing the existing reserves, and ore-processing capacity.

What if the world runs out of Dysprosium? We can still make do, but any substitutes will most likely be heavier and more inefficient with respect to magnetic properties. So no more sleek iPhones, tablets, netbooks. Non-renewable (nuclear, wind) energy will become costlier. No Prius. Unless we learn to make it synthetically, or find much more efficient magnets not using Dysprosium. 

Russia's Strategic Geo-Political Game

Russia, after the break-up of USSR into 15 CIS countries, has been reduced to a country with long, flat borders that are difficult to patrol and defend, with most of its neighbouring CIS countries, and precious little access to the sea except to the icy Barents and Kara Seas.; and through Kaliningrad, an outpost cut off from the contiguous land mass of the rest of Russia, to the Baltic Sea. Russia also has a narrow window to the Black Sea southwest of Volgograd.

Commercially, it has much of Europe by the short hairs, because of its stranglehold over supply of natural gas. At least 18 CIS and European countries are between 25% and 100% dependent on Russian natural gas, and have almost fully converted to gas for internal heating. So, every winter since 2005, when large parts of Europe are difficult to live in without gas heating, Russia turns on the diplomatic pressure using Ukraine (through which its gas pipeline passes) as the whipping boy. Over the last 6 years, Russia has played hardball and negotiated hard with Ukraine. This year's negotiations may begin any time now. 

Russia under Vladimir Putin (and now Medvedev with Putin breathing down his neck) has been playing a very smart and patient strategic game for the last over 15 years, where it uses all its strategic advantages to gain and extend its power and influence. In particular, it is keen on expanding till it gets access to a natural bulwark against invasion, in the form of sea, river, lake or mountain range; and rebuild Russia to its former glory. This intent is borne out by Putin's recent regret that leaders of the erstwhile USSR did not fight to prevent its collapse. In 2005, he had described the described the demise of the USSR as the "greatest geopolitical catastrophe" of the 20^th century. For example,

CIS Countries Map taken from Google Maps.

• Russian troops have recently (in April, 2010), ostensibly at the invitation of the Kyrgyzstan Government, bivouacked in Kyrghyzstan, thus making Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, the three CIS countries bordering that tiny, poor country, very uncomfortable. Kyrgyzstan is mostly mountains and highlands, giving this country strategic vantage points to peer into their neighbours' backyards.
  • At the south-east, Russian troops can look down from the Tien Shan mountains almost into Tashkent, capital of Uzbekistan.
  • At the north, from Bishkek, the capital of Kyrgyzstan, if you shout, you can be heard in Kazakhstan. Indeed, Almaty, the largest town in, and the former capital of, Kazakhstan, with 9% of this thinly populated country's population, is less than 250 kms away. I had predicted in this blog in April, 2010, that there will be trouble in Kazakhstan in the next 2-3 years, covertly fomented by Russia. This seems to have begun, if this report is to be believed. A state of emergency is currently in force, and curfew imposed, in an oil-producing town. Kazakhstan is an important exporter of crude, and interruption of supplies are a possibility, leading to upward pressure on global oil prices.
  • The third country, Tajikistan, large parts of which are mountainous and inhospitable, borders Afghanistan, a geo-politically important state. Besides, Tajikistan is currently locked in a dispute with Uzbekistan about sharing of waters of a river which is being dammed in Tajikistan.
  • Kyrgyzstan also has a long border on the east with China, and from the mountains there, you can peer into China's Uighur (muslim) province, which Al Qaeda cells have reportedly infiltrated. Further, the US has an air base called Manas in Kyrgyzstan which is a supply line to Afghanistan. Since the new Kyrgyzstan Government owes its existence and continuance in power to Russia. This air supply base for US operations in Afghanistan is in danger, if Russia is angered by US foreign policy.
• Kaliningrad gives Russia a shared border with Lithuania and Poland, and easy access to North Europe. As Lithuania is 100% dependent on Russia for its natural gas, like Latvia and Estonia, Lithuania has not much choice but to allow Russia land and airspace access to Kaliningrad, which is at the forefront of Russia's objection to US missile bases in CIS countries or other East European economies: Russia threatens retaliatory placement of nuclear warheads and missiles in Kaliningrad, virtually on the doorsteps of several Europe-facing CIS countries and all major EU countries. Thus, being NATO member-countries is a cold relief for Lativa, Lithuania and Estonia.
• Russia's friendship with Venezuela and Bolivia through Chavez and Pablo Morales respectively raises the spectre of a “gas-OPEC” which can control gas pricing and distribution throughout the world. Even Iran and Kazakhstan have explicitly supported such an idea. Simultaneously, by offering sweeteners to Iran to lay a new pipeline for gas to Europe through its territories, it is moving forward to make Europe even more dependent on Russia for gas, far into the future. Note that Bolivia, Venezuela, Iran and Russia together account for 45% of proven gas reserves in the world. Add Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, with whom Russia has signed long term exploration and supply agreements for gas (read: buys all its present and future gas output), and this figure crosses 50%. Throw in Equatorial Guinea, Trinidad and Tobago, Algeria, Argentina, Brunei, Nigeria, Oman and Qatar, all of whom are members of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum (GECF) of which a Russian is the Secretary General, and this formidable multilateral group controls more of the gas production and reserves of the world than OPEC did for oil. Besides, international companies have by now been pushed out of Russia, more or less, and Russian oil and gas is now consolidated in, and controlled by state-owned entities.
• Russia, along with 5 or 6 other UN member countries, notably including Venezuela, headed by Hugo Chavez, a known US-baiter, has recognized two breakaway provinces of Georgia (South Ossetia and Abkhazia) as separate countries in 2008. Russia has set up military presence in both these provinces, cocking a snook at the US and Europe, by drawing parallels to what they did by recognizing Kosovo earlier the same year over the objections of Russia. Thus, it breathes down the neck of the Georgian leadership, with South Ossetia being within shouting distance of Tbilisi, the capital. Abkhazia gives Russia much broader Black Sea coastline access, and cuts Georgia's access to it by half. When Georgia appealed for help, Europe did not budge because of its fear of angering Russia that supplies so much of Europe's natural gas. The US could not even think of coming to Georgia's rescue in these two theatres – because Russia patrolled access to Georgia via the Black Sea, and absent reliable supply lines, other than diplomatic support, it could do little else.
• Russia is so huge that it is easy to forget that in the south-east, Vladivostok, the last stop on the Great Trans-Siberian Railway at Russia's south-east tip, is very near the northern tip of North Korea, US's great bugbear. With the death of Kim-Jong Il, this geographic proximity has potential to invite international interest. I won't be surprised that with a young, untested leader in the saddle in N Korea holding a nuclear button, Russia and China attempt get friendly with N Korea. Revival of old proposals like a train from Russia through N Korea and onwards to S Korea; an oil pipeline through a similar route; and so on can be expected. In the north, the eastern-most point of Asia, that is almost permanently ice-bound, the Bering Strait separates US territory (Diomedes Islands, Alaska) from Russian by less than 50 kms, though a day apart on the calendar. (You may be able to spot Sarah Palin's kitchen from this part of Russia!) It is possible to ski across a frozen Bering Strait from Russia to the US (or vice versa) at this point (skiing to yesterday or tomorrow!). A time will soon come when Russia will begin to leverage these geographical quirks too. 

Has the US financial system thrown all caution to the winds?

I occasionally look at the US Debt Clock, and record my impressions on this blog. The biggest figure by far on this page, full of mind-bogglingly high figures, is the figure of currency and credit derivatives to which the US economy is exposed. The US financial system is becoming bolder – in the last 6 months, it seems that they have completely thrown caution to the winds, knowing that the rest of the developed world have little choice but to sink or swim with them.

Currency & Credit Derivatives Exposure of the US economy:

8 April, 2010	$648.975 Trillion	See this
26 Jul, 2011	$611.499 Trillion	See this
19 Dec, 2011	$766.628 Trillion	See this

From April to July, 2011, there seemed to be a 5% winding down (see this). However, since then, the exposure has shot up in the last 5 months to an unprecedented level. To put the current figure in context, currency and credit derivatives exposures have risen by $155 Trillion in 5 months – whereas the US GDP is $15 Trillion. The rise in this figure in only 5 months is 10 times the current GDP of the US economy; and 2-½ times the world GDP of $63.04 Trillion (World Bank figures, quoted on Wikipedia. See this).

Keep in mind that a large part of such exposures represent postponement of recognition of losses. This shows that the US economy continues to think that the rest of the world is a limitless risk sink; many ecnomists thought that the world had been cured of this naive belief. Stupidity is alive and kicking in the financial system!

Is China a currency manipulator?

Once upon a time, there were two countries, one named the US of A and the other named China. US of A bought Chinese goods cheaply for several years, by simply printing more of their money. China scrounged and worked hard, to be able to provide acceptable quality at very, very cheap dollar prices. US of A benefited hugely from a low priced yuan - it gave them more goods and value per dollar of spending. In the meanwhile, China saved, and saved, and saved. In US of A's dollars. So the US of A was the grasshopper that danced all summer, and China was the ant that saved up for the winter, from Aesop's fable.

China's thriftiness allowed the US of A to spend in excess of their incomes, and not bear the consequences, because, by buying up US of A's treasury bonds, China in effect sequestered the extra dollars printed in the US of A that could have led to inflation at home.

Now, US of A finds that they have reached the limit of deficit financing, and its cupboards are as empty as Old Mother Hubbard's was. They have suddenly realised that they have to repay all the Treasury Bonds that China has accumulated. They want to pay back the debts after China has appreciated the yuan, so that they will pay less dollars to pay off their debts. So they decide that China has to allow the yuan to appreciate against the dollar.

But China now has new-found confidence - the confidence of the rich ant, with a granary replete and bulging on all sides with dollar debts issued by the US of A. So it looks the US of A in the eye and says, "Please manage your own currency, we will manage ours." When pressed, the Chinese will point out that they have never lectured the US of A on what to do with their currency even when they were buying Chinese manufactured goods at a small fraction of what it would cost them to manufacture and sell, so why should China listen to lectures now?

So now, the US of A is doing the equivalent of the grasshopper in W Somerset Maugham's version - marry a rich widow and escape the consequences of past profligacy, by alleging that China is a currency manipulator, and forcing China to value its currency upwards. If China gives in, then they have been hit twice - once by being forced to sell goods cheaply with an undervalued currency; and once again when it is time for them to reap the benefits of investing their savings in US of A's Treasury bonds.  

Which version of "The Ant and the Grasshopper" will triumph - Aesop's, or Maugham's? The jury is out. I certainly hope that Maugham's cynical and dishonest grasshopper does not triumph. In this case, currently, it is worse: China's currency has risen, and yet they are being branded currency manipulators. 

Dexia Bank Collapse: What it means for Europe, Belgium and the World

Dexia Bank is among the Top 50 financial institutions in the world. It is not just some small, unknown bank. It is different from other banks because it, and with it, Belgium, are caught in an uncomfortable spot. How? Let me attempt an explanation.

1. Belgium has external debt to GDP ratio of close to 100% already. The Government thus does not have room for manouevre to fund losses of Dexia. That's already been done once - in 2008, the Belgian Government took control of Dexia. Various arms of Belgian and French Government now hold over 50% in Dexia. This closes off one source of succour. Worse, there is a political standoff in Belgium because of which there is no functioning Government at all at present in Belgium! Worst time for such problems to hit.
2. Dexia's leverage at present is estimated to be almost 60:1 – double that of Lehman Brothers when its collapse was triggered. So Dexia is not in pretty shape at all. Worse, of its over €500Bn of assets, €20Bn are debts of Portugal, Italy and Greece, all of whom are in need of bailouts.
3. After the 2008 takeover by the Government, instead of getting better, things got worse, because Dexia was a source of funds for the various parts of Belgium's Government. When they took it over, instead of stopping loans to Government which were the major part of its NPAs, they stepped up lending to Government, which enabled the Government to reduce its fiscal deficit somewhat. Now, if the Government were to bear even a small part of the losses of Dexia, its external debt to GDP ratio will shoot up to almost the level that Italy is at currently (which is 134%). So PIIGS will no longer be a sufficiently comprehensive acronym of European states in deep fiscal trouble. We have to find some way of adding a “B” to it. Just for comparison, US, Australia and India are at 99%, 94% and 22% respectively. France, one of the co-owners of Dexia, is at 208%.
4. The only time-tested solution for banks or financial institutions in such a mess as Dexia finds itself in is to break up the institution into a “good bank” and a “bad bank” - like India did for Unit Trust of India a decade or so ago. Usually, the bad bank sells the 'bad” assets for anything they can get for it – which could be single digit percentages of the book value. In Dexia's case, this is apparently not feasible because (a) Belgium's Government does not have the money and the political will (there is no functioning government now!) to bail out Dexia because it would mean choking its own source of funding; and (b) “Good bank” assets have not takers almost anywhere in the world today. So the good bank-bad bank solution will not work very well for Dexia. But that is the only solution – so you can expect sell-offs of any saleable assets.
   
   
   Already, Reuters reports Qatar as being interesting in buying out Dexia's Luxembourg business. So the dismembering of the Bank has officially begun. The vultures are circling, but then, there aren't too many vultures, this time. Trading has been suspended in Dexia's shares, and S&P has downgraded Dexia's group companies steeply. In its downgrade press release, it notes that there is negative revaluation reserve in respect of available-for-sale securities of almost €6.9 Bn. Moody's has followed S&P in steeply downgrading (by 3 levels) the sovereign rating of Italy, and also some Italian banks in the last 2 days. Besides, 12 UK banks and 9 Portuguese banks have also been downgraded. Sovereign ratings of Spain, Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Cyprus have been cut as well. From the US, Ben Bernanke has said that the US economy is close to faltering. Deutsche Bank has warned that it will miss its profit target.
   
   
   One must remember that failing banks are not just like manufacturing or services companies that fail. Banks, as they fail, tear asunder the transaction enablement capability of its citizens. Thus, slitting the banking system's throat is akin to slitting the underbelly of a crocodile – however strong the economy may otherwise be, the banking system is its weakest link. This, all the above news in just a few days is bad news indeed, for the entire world. When banks collapse, other businesses will follow, and depositors will panic, causing a financial logjam in not just those countries, but in all countries where businesses have business ties with enterprises in countries whose banking systems are collapsing.
   In India, our very own SBI has suffered a downgrade because of its low Tier-I capital level that would require it to raise money and/or ask for Government help/ support. So where is the good news? If at all, it is in India where the Government has both, the wherewithal (with some difficulty) and the will and inclination, to support its banks.
   PostScript: This is the text of an email I received. Makes for interesting reading.
   Uncertainty has now hit Japan. In the last seven days, Origami bank has folded, Sumo Bank has gone belly up and Bonsai Bank has announced plans to cut some of its branches. Yesterday, it was also announced that Karaoke Bank will go up for sale and will likely go for a song, while shares in Kamikaze Bank were suspended today after they nose-dived. While Samurai Bank is soldiering on after sharp cutbacks, 500 staff at Karate Bank got the chop and analysts report that there is something fishy going on at Sushi Bank, where it is feared that staff may get a raw deal.

Putting the Bank of America situation in perspective

What would you think of the state of the Indian economy, if what I said of BofA and Citibank was said of State Bank of India and ICICI Bank in India by some economist of repute? 

The situation is that serious for the US and for many countries in Europe, where the nation's top banks have dug themselves into deep holes that not even the EU or their respective Governments can afford. All these economies have their underbellies exposed.

On both continents, banks are hiding behind accounting gobbledygook called Impairment and Fair Value Accounting. But the understanding is filtering through. Tonight (in India) brought news of a blood bath on bourses in the US and Europe. So tomorrow (19th August) will almost certainly see a bloodbath on Indian stock exchanges - as FII Fund Managers make a beeline to the nearest exit. Expect a fall of at least 400 points in the Sensex on 19th August, 2011 before short covering enables a partial recovery.

I believe that this is the beginning of the unravelling of several economies in Europe and of the US economy as well, with them slipping into R-2, needing QE-3 and possibly QE-4.

I shall write again tomorrow to report whether what I said about the bloodbath on Indian stock markets was accurate. I feel comfortable making these gloomy predictions because I currently am sitting on cash, having (fortunately) believed in my own predictions and taken my own advice!

The Gold Standard: In Memoriam

On August 15, 1971, 40 years and 3 days ago, President Nixon, remembered today for another of his “achievements” - the Watergate scandal, announced that the United States will go off the gold standard. Till then, the gold standard meant that the money supply in any country would be limited to a specified proportion of the gold reserves owned by the Government. The gold standard was abandoned when the consumption-hungry Americans found the fiscal discipline it imposed on all Governments too inconvenient, and substituted it with a promise of the United States Government, then the most powerful and richest country on Earth.

After this epochal action, demand for Gold fell worldwide. To such an extent that India (its citizens, not the Government) was the only net importing country in the world, importing what the rest of the world exported, for well over two decades. Till India reached its economic nadir in 1991, when the Government was forced to sell or pledge tonnes of gold to save the country from financial bankruptcy. After that, India has slowly picked up its gold buying again, and Indians are still the world's leading buyers of gold. The RBI has bought back all the gold it pledged, and more. I am also sure that the RBI has recently bought more gold – it announces the value of its foreign currency reserves in US Dollars, but the actual composition is India's best-kept secret. I suspect that the RBI has fallen back on the age-old wisdom of buying gold when all currencies' future looks uncertain.

For aeons, gold has been considered in India as a refuge against uncertainty, as well as a status symbol – something no family would sell unless they were in dire straits, and then too, with the internal understanding that they would buy it back at the earliest. So while India's Government is the 10^th richest in terms of gold holdings officially declared, Indian citizens' private hoard of gold, if added to the RBI's holding, would probably make India the richest nation with the most liquid reserves in the whole world.

In the meanwhile, the freedom from the peg to gold allowed the United States to spend like there was no tomorrow. Whenever it looked like tomorrow would dawn, the United States would instigate a competitive devaluation game among other countries, which enhanced the external value of the dollar, which ensured that tomorrow was deferred yet again. Dollar prices of gold went up briefly following the 1974 oil price shock; and then again after the 1979 oil shock. Then, it continually fell till 2001. So, if one compared gold prices against inflation or any other currency value, gold always suffered, till end of 2001 when it was $272.22 in the NY market. After 9/11, some Middle Eastern countries and their residents, sharing the Eastern love for gold with India, began hoarding up on gold. So dollar prices of gold started looking up. But then, in 2007-8, tomorrow arrived.

By 2009, gold had crossed the hitherto unthinkable barrier of $1,000 an ounce. To put this in context, in August, 1971, when the gold exchange window closed, the price of gold per ounce (1 troy ounce=about 31.1 grams) was $37.60 (according to Niall Ferguson in his excellent book, The Ascent of Money). Going to $1,000 in 38 years means a CAGR of around 9% per annum. A handsome rate, but absolutely mind-boggling, if one allows for the fact that for almost 32 of these 38 years, gold prices hardly rose at a CAGR of 3% in dollar terms, when it rose at all. Do you know what the price of gold now is? It is $1,794 an ounce as I write this, in August 2011. Which means a growth of 79% over the 2000 value of gold.

Let us look at this from another perspective. If an American had turned in $1,000 before the US went off the gold standard, he would have got almost 26.6 ounces of gold. The same quantity of gold today would be worth $47,720. This is an index of how much the value of the dollar has slipped and that of gold has gone up. This means that gold worth $1,000 is now worth almost 48 times as much in 40 years – a CAGR of about 10.1%. Not bad, for something considered as a bad investment by the whole world, for almost 30 years! When the world realizes that gold has proved to be a safer haven than any other currency, there could be a renewed weakening in the belief in the US Dollar as a store of value and as a reserve currency.

Way back in June, 2008 I had written that it was time to buy Gold.  Elsewhere, I have written that gold prices could touch $4,000 an ounce in 3-5 years. At the rate the price of gold has been shooting up in the last few months, this price point should be reached much sooner than 3 years, if only because of the expected continuing weakness of the dollar. So will we see a return to the Gold Standard, or some variant of that? That has to be counted as a distinct possibility after the S&P downgrade of the AAA+ rating of the US.

Till that happens, we Indians should thank our womenfolk for consistently ignoring advice that investing in Gold was a poor bet. Thanks to that, India is possibly the most liquid and financially secure economy in the world today. What's more, it is a hidden strength - it is the reason why Indian families will survive in a world without Medicare/ MedicAid/ Social Security.

(Historical gold dollar price data sourced from www.measuringworth.com and current price from http://goldprice.org)

 

BofA: The vultures are gathering ...

Barely 3 days after I blogged on the death spiral Bank of America seems to be sliding into, the signs of death throes have become clearer. Already, its share price represents only 32% of its book value, showing that the market agrees with my assessment that its assets are massively overstated. I had pointed out only one asset, Goodwill, that called for significant impairment.  
Wall Street Journal now reports that Bank of America has entered into deals to sell the following:

• its Canadian Credit Card portfolio to TD Bank
• its Spanish Credit Card unit 
• its small-business cards in the UK to Barclays

WSJ also reports that BofA intends to sell other card units in Europe. It further speculates that BofA may also sell its stake in China Construction Bank Corp. Another report states that Bank of America has also sold off portions of its credit card business within the United States to Sovereign Bank and to Regions Financial Corporation. In April this year, BofA sold its stake in Black Rock Inc.. 
All these sales are obviously intended to shrink its way into a viable situation by raising money without a share issue, and also thus raising "tangible net worth per share" of Bank of America.
If you think BofA was the only bank in trouble, look at this list of 64 FDIC-insured banks that have failed and closed down in the first 7 months of 2011. This is in addition to 157 banks that failed in 2010, and 138 in 2009. It is obvious that things aren't getting better. But that they have company is cold comfort for BofA, around whom vultures are gathering. 

• In early 2011, it settled charges of mortgage-backed securities fraud charges with BlackRock, PIMCO, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, insurer Assured Guaranty and a few others, agreeing to pay $8.5 Bn. These settlements have run into some trouble, and are now facing opposition.
• Already, AIG has claimed $10 Bn damages for securities fraud in sale of mortgage-backed securities by BofA, Merrill and Countrywide. 
• In addition, over 90 similar suits have been filed demanding damages of $197Bn, says the above article, quoting LawyerLinks, a legal consulting firm.
• Now, it  is being reported that the National Credit Union Administration has declared that it is suing several banks for damages of up to $50Bn for misrepresenting safety of securities it sold to several credit unions that collapsed as a result of the investments. Among those likely to be sued is Merrill, now part of BofA. 
• Credit Default Swaps on BofA have risen to their highest level since May 2009, showing nervousness of investors.
• BofA has begun writing down principal on Californian "underwater" home loan mortgages of troubled borrowers. BofA is reported to be seeking immunity from prosecution in return for paying fines and writing down principal outstandings of underwater mortgages.
• Elsewhere, BofA is facing energetic protests from locals fed up of the number of foreclosed properties that are ill-maintained, sending property values in entire localities tumbling. 
• The richest Hedge Fund Manager in the world according to Forbes' 2011 List of Billionaires, John Paulson, and who is known for sticking to his bets for longer than most fund managers, has sold half his stake in BofA and Citigroup.

There is speculation that it could spin off Merrill Lynch Wealth Management and Investment Banking operations. There is also some speculation that BofA could put Countrywide, acquisition of which is by consensus considered as a big corporate blunder, into bankruptcy. However, moves taken to consolidate Countrywide and BofA have clouded BofA's ability to ringfence Countrywide-related liabilities. 
Watch this space! 

The Death Spiral beckons ...

Bloomberg reported that as of August 10, 2011, 186 US-based financial services companies traded for less than 60 percent of their book value, or common shareholder equity, including Bank of America, Citigroup Inc., Morgan Stanley, AIG and SunTrust Banks Inc. Together, they had a market capitalization of $300.5 billion, compared with $686.4 billion of book value. This means that a fall in their share prices to this extent (40%) is well nigh inevitable. 

How likely? These banks are very, very vulnerable. For example, earlier this week, AIG filed a suit accusing Bank of America of securities fraud; demanding damages of $10Bn. This sent the BofA stock down 20%, in addition to the bloodbath that the Dow Jones has experienced in the week after August 2, and the S&P downgrade. Its market cap stood reduced to $68.6Bn. Compare this with just one year-end intangible item on its 2010 Balance Sheet: Goodwill is shown at $73.8Bn (see p.130, Table XIII. See also Footnote 1 below)  – forget the rest of its balance sheet, BofA would have the world believe that this intangible item alone, built up from excess over book value paid for its past acquisitions, is worth more than the entire BofA is worth on Wall Street. How many will believe this, and for how long? There will always be the small boy who shouts, “The Emperor is not wearing any clothes!”. After reading Page 114-115 of its 2010 Annual Report, any accountant will understand that BofA will have to write down goodwill significantly (it wrote down $12.4Bn in 2010) - and to keep the shareholders' equity intact after this write-down, it would need to raise more equity. The dilution this would almost certainly drag the share price lower. Which will require them to raise more equity at even lower prices ... leading to a death spiral.

What about the demand for financial sector shares? All but non-existent. Retail interest was never very visible in the US in equities; now it has disappeared. Institutional investors are worried about what write-down of such intangibles would do to the Balance Sheet – and will stay away from any further issues in sufficient number as to make a public issue a very big gamble that could very easily fail. So the only solution – a government bailout wherein the financial institutions that still bear the TBTF tag (Too Big To Fail) are partly nationalized. Expect this to happen in the not too distant future, when the pressure of reporting numbers that have no relation to stock market prices forces them to look for ways of raising their net worth to blunt the edge of the writedowns that are inevitable already. 
What if the US Government finds it politically unpalatable or impossible to rescue these firms with a QE3? Refer to the title of this post! 




Footnote 1 referred to above: 
Table XIII on p.130, and Table XII and Table XIV before and after it, were the result of BofA's attempt to dress up their Income Statement and Balance Sheet, and the justifications for using these were on page 40. If they had followed GAAP alone, the Tables and the explanation on p.40 would be unnecessary. They used "non-GAAP measures" - euphemism for accounting legerdemain to make accounts smell sweeter, euphemism for which is "additional clarity". The footnote to Table XIII reads: Presents reconciliations of non-GAAP measures to GAAP financial measures. We believe the use of these non-GAAP measures provides additional clarity in assessing the results of the Corporation. Other companies may define or calculate non-GAAP measures differently.

The US Debt Crisis: What does it mean for the World?

Let us do some crystal-ball gazing. 

1. The US debt crisis would certainly have spooked central bankers the world over - they will already have stopped thinking of the dollar as impregnable. If dollar is not reliable as a reserve currency, what is? A few years ago, the Euro would have been seen as a viable alternative. No longer. The Euro and the Dollar are locked in a waltz on a downward sloping dance floor. 
2. No single alternative will emerge. Over a period, before the US gets hit with its next politico-financial crisis (see para 7 below for a more detailed explanation), central bankers of smaller countries will move out of the dollar, eventually maintaining (maybe) no more than 3-4 weeks' US$ transactions worth of dollars. China will do it slowest of all, because they will get hit the most if they were to enter the market as sellers - China is an 8,000-pound gorilla in this arena. Three alternatives come to mind: (a)  more bilateral, regional and broader multilateral initiatives will emerge, for transacting in currencies other than the USD. (b) Gold will be a natural alternative for both, central bankers and the population in general, and (at least in dollar terms), gold will soon zoom past $2,000 per ounce though the present price, an all-time record, (at the time of writing) was at $1,637 in the spot market. (c) some strong currencies like will emerge as temporary havens, for example, Swiss francs.
3. Rating agencies will have to revisit their sovereign rating norms. Currently, it is unthinkable in their models to question the rating of AAA to the US. The rating is maintained even though the country is (by their President's own admission on prime-time television) four days away from default. India's rating was junk grade in 1991, when India teetered on the brink of default, having forex reserves to pay for three weeks of oil imports.  Today, besides the US, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, and Italy (all these countries are either on the brink of default or have been bailed out at least once) are rated higher than India in Euromoney's 2011 country ratings. This already looks so untenable as to damage the reputation of the rater, rather than the country that is rated low! What's worse, rather than downgrade countries, Moody's created three sub-categories within countries with the same rating: resistant (the highest), resilient and vulnerable. So you have countries considered vulnerable in the sense that there is high probability that it may default on its debt. Yet, they have a credit rating of AAA. A higher rating means that companies in these countries can raise money more cheaply from anywhere in the world. 
4. So it is ridiculous that world-beating companies from India have to pay a higher rate of interest on their borrowings when: 
5. • both, the country and its companies boast of far better than average financials and economic projections,
   • very stable Government and political establishment, where successive Governments headed by different political parties have demonstrated continuing commitments to reform and globalization, 
   • the world's most transparent and efficient secondary capital markets (with T+2 settlement cycle), 
   • healthiest banking sector compared to almost any country in the Western world, overseen by the world's most competent central bankers, 
   • higher GDP growth rates and projections than most countries in the world of any consequence bar China,  
   • and world-beating companies and innovators that are major contenders in every major acquisition of any consequence in almost every country in the world.
6. About gold, there is something strange going on: the record prices are bringing people in Europe to the jewelry stores, selling their necklaces and earrings. In India, the reverse is happening. Indians are buying up more gold than before, even at never-before prices! Make no mistake, the Indians are the wise guys. 
7. The US debt crisis is worse than one thinks. The US Government has gotten used to record fiscal deficits. There is no way they will mend their ways. Even if the August 2 crisis is averted, President Obama himself has said that the current law raising the limit will only enable the US to pay for what they have already spent. Nobody seems to notice, especially the sovereign credit raters, that this is the classic definition of a debt trap - struggling to borrow to pay for what you have already spent. Before long, the US will need more limits, to pay for the deficit they are already building up. Obama will end up specializing in going to the House to ask for more money to pay for his predecessor's follies and his own inability to entirely reverse them. A simple statistic is telling: From April 2010 till today, the average per capita GDP has gone up by $1,100 with rising unemployment ("jobless growth") while US per capita National Debt has gone up by $5,200. 
8. China has to manage the other end of the sword - while the US's declining influence will mean its rise, economically, it will hurt more than any other country save the US, from a declining dollar, because they have trillions of them in their coffers.
9. I was amused to read that Apple Inc is today more cash-rich than the US Government, the most powerful Government on Earth!  

Some scary statistics about the US - revisited

In April, 2010, I had blogged about some scary statistics about the US economy. I revisited these statistics, and here are the results. While everyone is absorbed about whether the Republicans will agree to increase the US debt ceiling, let us revisit some statistics that looked scary to me in April, 2010. Let us see what has happened since then.

• US National Debt has gone up from 89% of US GDP to 98% of GDP.
• Total US Public Debt stands at $14.293 Trillion; by August, it will touch $14.3 Trillion, which is the current ceiling.
• US GDP per citizen has actually gone up by a little over $1,100, in spite of increasing unemployment numbers.
• However, US National Debt per citizen has gone up by $5,200 in the same period.
• US Debt held by foreign countries has gone up from $3.875 Trillion to $4.584 Trillion.
• US external debt to GDP ratio has crossed 100%. The equivalent figure currently for India is 21%. For the UK and France, this ratio is at a staggering 388% and 208% respectively.
• Assets per citizen has gone up by $8,900 while Liabilities per citizen has gone up by a staggering $674,000. Similarly, Interest burden per citizen is up from $1,493 to $11,664.
• There has been winding down of about 5% of currency and credit derivative exposures, but a much longer road remains to be traversed.
• All-in-all, a dismal report card. For a Nobel Peace Prize-winning President who has got the US involved in a third senseless aggression in Libya, and so far failed to unwind its involvement in two other messy wars it has been engaged in for more than a decade. 

	8 Apr, 2010	26 Jul, 2011
US National Debt to GDP (%):	89.12	98.18
US National Debt per citizen ($):	41381	46619
US GDP per citizen ($):	46381	47488
US Total Debt per citizen ($):	180484	176113
US Personal Debt per citizen ($):	53787	51441
US Interest Burden per citizen ($):	1493	11664
US Total Assets per citizen ($):	234181	243086
US Total Liabilities per citizen ($):	350054	1026974
US Gross Domestic Product ($):	14.333 Trillion	14.809 Trillion
US Debt held by Foreign Countries ($):	3.875 Trillion	4.584 Trillion
US Government Bailout ($):	6.387 Trillion
Currency and Credit Derivatives ($):	648.975 Trillion	611.499 Trillion

• One point about India: Gold is a bulwark against uncertainty. Indian Government's holding of gold currently is higher than all countries save 9; if the private hoard of gold in Indian families is taken into account, India's gold holdings would be at least twice that of any other country on Earth. Gold prices are at their record high of $1,600 and John Paulson (the hedge fund manager who made a killing in 2008 by betting that the sub-prime crisis would result in CDO/CMO defaults) says it will touch $4,000 an ounce in the next 3-5 years.