Global Power Shift

This is just a series of observations that support my idea that we are living in what, in a few decades, will be seen as tumultous times.

Recently, there was a news item that stated that by 2020, China will become a larger economy than the US; and by 2050, India will top even China, leaving the US a distant third. This is not someone's wishful thinking, but just the magic of compounding – of economic growth, rather than of your money in a bank.

Today, we are all living at the crossroads of history. A subtle power shift, significantly visible in time frames of decades, but barely perceptible at the time frame level of a day or a week, is happening all the time. Witness the following:

• The Arab Spring happened over a period of months and still seems dramatic. I doubt if the spring has completely spent itself. It is not yet all cool in Syria and Egypt, and it may yet erupt again in some other nation(s).
• Technology laughs at national and geographic borders. Accountability and clean governance pressures were earlier driven within each nation's power centres, laterally. However, now there are vertical pressures that cross national borders earily – thanks to telecom, internet, satellite broadcasting and global moneychangers (both, traders and speculators).
• Unregulated or unpoliced space soon becomes populated with groups that thrive on chaos and absence of regulation. Witness Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, etc. to see the truth of this.
• Unregulated pockets in otherwise regulated economies also give birth to chaos. While this is not to be taken as an approval of the concept of a police state, it is sobering to hear Paddy Ashdown cite a fact that 60% of the $4M that funded the 9/11 bombings passed through the WTC itself!
• Now, the enemy is within each country. Thus, for properly defending a country, the defence ministry may need to speak to the Health ministry (to protect against pandemics); Ministry of Commerce and Industry (the hi-tech infrastructure of the country is sensitive and vulnerable to attack), Home Affairs (to track infiltrators), and Transportation (Air/ ship/ road security). Defending our borders is just not enough.
• The maximum vulnerability is at all “interconnection points” (airports, docks, bus and train terminals). So defending at such points necessarily means overlap in responsibilities and powers. Hence, working with others efficiently is a capability all need to develop.
• Defence co-operation is not enough. Nations and people living in them need to realize that war is an immensely expensive zero-sum game that can go on infintely to their collective detriment. Only then can long-festering disputes cool down sufficiently to permit normal life.
• In 1945, when WW-II ended, there were about 100 countries. Today, there are nearly 200. We are adding almost 1.5 new  countries a year on an average over the last 67 years.  At the same, time, we have witnessed European countries lowering the borders and becoming a single currency area (that initiative is arguably in the endgame stage already).
• Siberia has such inclement weather that in the Far East province of Russia (area double of India) less than 60 Lakh people live. Greater Mumbai has double that population! However, it is a source of power for Russia – most of its natural gas and oil is sourced from this vast area. Surprisingly, this is a source of power for China too! Global warming has given rise to vast wheat fields in Siberia – but there is no one in Russia to feed. Russia's population is shrinking. But we see that some 600,000 Chinese migrate to Siberia, cultivate wheat during the summer on vast leased farm tracts, and come back home every year. This wheat feeds a good proportion of the Chinese population.
• China is controlling a larger and larger part of the world – without firing a shot. They are, quite literally, either buying them up, or colonizing through sheer numbers of immigrants. They are “partnering for prosperity” with several poorer countries, notably in Africa. Thereby, it is creating a China-centric circle of influence that rivals that of the US already. China has trade relationships with Korea, Japan and other countries in the neighborhood, and lower tariffs for poorer countries. In Singapore, Vietnam and Malaysia, the ethnic Chinese population is a significant, loosely united power bloc. In BRICS and in the Asian Free Trade Zone, China is assuming an increasingly dominant role. For example, on Iran, both China and Russia have vetoed UN Resolutions sponsored by the US for increased sanctions. China is still the largest customer of Iranian oil, with India being second.
• Chinese yuan is threatens to emerge as an alternative reserve currency in addition to the dollar and euro, which (when, not if, China can get away with it) will deflate the US balloon much faster than one can imagine. When that happens, the US will be awash (not overnight, but over a finite period of, say, 3 years) with inflation of  the trillion dollars of bonds that China won't need. Thus, the US seems poised to deteriorate as a global power. Inflation robs from the poor, and shifts even more economic power to the rich, so it will exacerbate social tensions in the US, as the feeling is already rife that the US bends backwards to accommodate the rich, at the cost of the poor. The recent BRICS meet discussed this concept, but shied away from pushing immediately for it. If, and when, yuan gets adopted as an alternative reserve currency, the power shift will accelerate.

I intend to develop this line of thinking further in coming days and weeks. I welcome inputs in the form of comments from anyone who has more to contribute to this line of thinking.

Russia's Strategic Geo-Political Game

Russia, after the break-up of USSR into 15 CIS countries, has been reduced to a country with long, flat borders that are difficult to patrol and defend, with most of its neighbouring CIS countries, and precious little access to the sea except to the icy Barents and Kara Seas.; and through Kaliningrad, an outpost cut off from the contiguous land mass of the rest of Russia, to the Baltic Sea. Russia also has a narrow window to the Black Sea southwest of Volgograd.

Commercially, it has much of Europe by the short hairs, because of its stranglehold over supply of natural gas. At least 18 CIS and European countries are between 25% and 100% dependent on Russian natural gas, and have almost fully converted to gas for internal heating. So, every winter since 2005, when large parts of Europe are difficult to live in without gas heating, Russia turns on the diplomatic pressure using Ukraine (through which its gas pipeline passes) as the whipping boy. Over the last 6 years, Russia has played hardball and negotiated hard with Ukraine. This year's negotiations may begin any time now. 

Russia under Vladimir Putin (and now Medvedev with Putin breathing down his neck) has been playing a very smart and patient strategic game for the last over 15 years, where it uses all its strategic advantages to gain and extend its power and influence. In particular, it is keen on expanding till it gets access to a natural bulwark against invasion, in the form of sea, river, lake or mountain range; and rebuild Russia to its former glory. This intent is borne out by Putin's recent regret that leaders of the erstwhile USSR did not fight to prevent its collapse. In 2005, he had described the described the demise of the USSR as the "greatest geopolitical catastrophe" of the 20^th century. For example,

CIS Countries Map taken from Google Maps.

• Russian troops have recently (in April, 2010), ostensibly at the invitation of the Kyrgyzstan Government, bivouacked in Kyrghyzstan, thus making Tajikistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, the three CIS countries bordering that tiny, poor country, very uncomfortable. Kyrgyzstan is mostly mountains and highlands, giving this country strategic vantage points to peer into their neighbours' backyards.
  • At the south-east, Russian troops can look down from the Tien Shan mountains almost into Tashkent, capital of Uzbekistan.
  • At the north, from Bishkek, the capital of Kyrgyzstan, if you shout, you can be heard in Kazakhstan. Indeed, Almaty, the largest town in, and the former capital of, Kazakhstan, with 9% of this thinly populated country's population, is less than 250 kms away. I had predicted in this blog in April, 2010, that there will be trouble in Kazakhstan in the next 2-3 years, covertly fomented by Russia. This seems to have begun, if this report is to be believed. A state of emergency is currently in force, and curfew imposed, in an oil-producing town. Kazakhstan is an important exporter of crude, and interruption of supplies are a possibility, leading to upward pressure on global oil prices.
  • The third country, Tajikistan, large parts of which are mountainous and inhospitable, borders Afghanistan, a geo-politically important state. Besides, Tajikistan is currently locked in a dispute with Uzbekistan about sharing of waters of a river which is being dammed in Tajikistan.
  • Kyrgyzstan also has a long border on the east with China, and from the mountains there, you can peer into China's Uighur (muslim) province, which Al Qaeda cells have reportedly infiltrated. Further, the US has an air base called Manas in Kyrgyzstan which is a supply line to Afghanistan. Since the new Kyrgyzstan Government owes its existence and continuance in power to Russia. This air supply base for US operations in Afghanistan is in danger, if Russia is angered by US foreign policy.
• Kaliningrad gives Russia a shared border with Lithuania and Poland, and easy access to North Europe. As Lithuania is 100% dependent on Russia for its natural gas, like Latvia and Estonia, Lithuania has not much choice but to allow Russia land and airspace access to Kaliningrad, which is at the forefront of Russia's objection to US missile bases in CIS countries or other East European economies: Russia threatens retaliatory placement of nuclear warheads and missiles in Kaliningrad, virtually on the doorsteps of several Europe-facing CIS countries and all major EU countries. Thus, being NATO member-countries is a cold relief for Lativa, Lithuania and Estonia.
• Russia's friendship with Venezuela and Bolivia through Chavez and Pablo Morales respectively raises the spectre of a “gas-OPEC” which can control gas pricing and distribution throughout the world. Even Iran and Kazakhstan have explicitly supported such an idea. Simultaneously, by offering sweeteners to Iran to lay a new pipeline for gas to Europe through its territories, it is moving forward to make Europe even more dependent on Russia for gas, far into the future. Note that Bolivia, Venezuela, Iran and Russia together account for 45% of proven gas reserves in the world. Add Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, with whom Russia has signed long term exploration and supply agreements for gas (read: buys all its present and future gas output), and this figure crosses 50%. Throw in Equatorial Guinea, Trinidad and Tobago, Algeria, Argentina, Brunei, Nigeria, Oman and Qatar, all of whom are members of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum (GECF) of which a Russian is the Secretary General, and this formidable multilateral group controls more of the gas production and reserves of the world than OPEC did for oil. Besides, international companies have by now been pushed out of Russia, more or less, and Russian oil and gas is now consolidated in, and controlled by state-owned entities.
• Russia, along with 5 or 6 other UN member countries, notably including Venezuela, headed by Hugo Chavez, a known US-baiter, has recognized two breakaway provinces of Georgia (South Ossetia and Abkhazia) as separate countries in 2008. Russia has set up military presence in both these provinces, cocking a snook at the US and Europe, by drawing parallels to what they did by recognizing Kosovo earlier the same year over the objections of Russia. Thus, it breathes down the neck of the Georgian leadership, with South Ossetia being within shouting distance of Tbilisi, the capital. Abkhazia gives Russia much broader Black Sea coastline access, and cuts Georgia's access to it by half. When Georgia appealed for help, Europe did not budge because of its fear of angering Russia that supplies so much of Europe's natural gas. The US could not even think of coming to Georgia's rescue in these two theatres – because Russia patrolled access to Georgia via the Black Sea, and absent reliable supply lines, other than diplomatic support, it could do little else.
• Russia is so huge that it is easy to forget that in the south-east, Vladivostok, the last stop on the Great Trans-Siberian Railway at Russia's south-east tip, is very near the northern tip of North Korea, US's great bugbear. With the death of Kim-Jong Il, this geographic proximity has potential to invite international interest. I won't be surprised that with a young, untested leader in the saddle in N Korea holding a nuclear button, Russia and China attempt get friendly with N Korea. Revival of old proposals like a train from Russia through N Korea and onwards to S Korea; an oil pipeline through a similar route; and so on can be expected. In the north, the eastern-most point of Asia, that is almost permanently ice-bound, the Bering Strait separates US territory (Diomedes Islands, Alaska) from Russian by less than 50 kms, though a day apart on the calendar. (You may be able to spot Sarah Palin's kitchen from this part of Russia!) It is possible to ski across a frozen Bering Strait from Russia to the US (or vice versa) at this point (skiing to yesterday or tomorrow!). A time will soon come when Russia will begin to leverage these geographical quirks too. 

Algorithmic Trading - Why Indian Stock Markets are Endangered

A few months ago, I had blogged about tight coupling in financial markets. In that entry,I had explained at a micro-level the impact of algorithmic trading. Given below is a "macro" story about how high-frequency trading in securities using computer programs played a big role in (though I would stop short of saying that they caused) a violent fluctuation in shares' and securities' prices on Wall Street last year. In less than 15 minutes, the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index plummetted and lost almost 6% of the opening value - and then recovered almost all of it in the next 15 minutes.

What happened on May 6, 2010 on Wall Street?

Major equity indices in futures as well as securities markets, already down 4% from the earlier day's close, suddenly plummetted a further 5-6% before recovering equally quickly, all in minutes. This affected almost all the 8,000 securities and ETFs in similar manner. Over 20,000 trades were reported to have been transacted at prices 60% from their prices just a few moments earlier.

Why did this happen?

At 2:32 pm, on an already volatile day, Waddell and Reed Financial Inc (not named by the joint CTFC-SEC report dated Sept 30, 2010, but named by many news reports) started a computer program to sell 75,000 E-Mini futures contracts worth close to $4.1 Bn. This was programmed to sell at any price and time, so instead of an orderly sale over a few hours, it sold this huge quantity of contracts within the space of 20 minutes, accelerating the sales as prices fell.

What actually happened during the crash?

The contagion spread to the equities market when arbitrageurs noticed the growing gap between the equities and futures prices. A significant finding is that 6 HFT (High Frequency Trading) firms (i.e., firms that extensively used algorithmic trading) remained active in the market even during the crash period of a few minutes. A blow-by-blow account follows:

• Five minutes into the crash, at 2:37 pm, data feeds from computers groaning under the huge numbers of contracts, started slowing down, leaving both, exchanges and investors uncertain about where share prices stood.
• The NASDAQ went into “self-help mode” at 2:37 pm where the transactions were not routed through NYSE's Arca electronic trading platform. CBoT and BATS exchanges (BATS at 2:49 pm) followed and also went into “self-help mode” which means that trades on NASDAQ, CBoT and BATS did not need to honour an Arca quote from NYSE.
• By 2:40, some trading and market-making firms started pulling out, due to algorithms that pause when they sense large price movements that could be due to questionable data feed. This left the market short of ready buyers and sellers. Apple, for example fell by $23 in 2 minutes, with the buy-sell spread going up to $5 instead of a few cents.
• Volumes of E-Mini contracts that normally mimic the S&P 500 surged but liquidity dried up. As a result, at 2:45:17 pm, E-Mini prices plunged 12.75 cents in half a second. This set off a circuit breaker that halted trading for 5 seconds.
• As individual stocks declined as much as 10%, ETF traders started withdrawing from the market.
• Then, at 2:46, even more strange things started happening because of the sheer speed difference between trades being put through and displayed – P&G shares were offered for purchase at prices higher than offered for sale! This is never supposed to happen in an electronic exchange.
• At 2:47, Dow reaches its nadir for the day, down 998 points or 9.2% from the opening level. Accenture, trading minutes earlier at $40, was offered at 1 cent.
• Then, at 2:49, the Dow rebounded by 300 points in 1 minute.

• There were no takers for ETF shares – iShares S&P500 Value Index Fund traded for 11 cents. But the broad recovery continued. By 2:58, indices reached the level they were at 2:30 pm.
• At 3:01, almost a half-hour to the minute since the crisis began, NASDAQ snapped out of its self-help mode and resumed routing orders to the Arca trading platform.
• At 4 pm, the DJIA closed 340 points below its previous close.

The Joint CFTC-SEC investigating committee reported that several HFT firms they interviewed had algorithms that took trading decisions based on direct proprietary data feed from the exchange directly rather than on consolidated market data, to reduce “latency” or delays measured in milliseconds. These algorithms went awry when the data feed from the exchange slowed down. Those HFT firms that did not depend on direct feeds for trading decisions got contradictory feeds that led to unease in taking decisions. Yet others that were not concerned with data latency in milliseconds simply withdrew from the markets.

The HFT firms that depended on their algorithms for trading decisions were not affected by the “self-help” declarations of NASDAQ, CBoT and BATS, and continued to rout orders to these exchanges. Therefore, the “self-help” declarations were ruled out as a cause of the volatility.

While no clear single cause was pointed out, HFTs using algorithms to trade rapidly (in one documented case, 200 trades exchanged hands 27,000 times in 14 seconds) were commonly thought of as the villains. It must be said, though, that there have been spirited defences by algorithmic trading experts, who point (among other factors) to volatility when markets are closed (ie difference between closing prices and opening prices on next day) as the real villain of the piece – on the logic that overnight differences can only be caused by humans, who are prone to panic unlike computers.

Even so, the SEC has since instituted a system of circuit breakers to arrest rollercoaster falls like the one experienced on Wall Street on May 6, 2010. This is another lesson that they have learnt by experience – instead of simply looking eastwards and learning from Indian bourses.

What can we learn from this?

But now, the stage has come to re-learn from our own wisdom. Algorithmic trading is now allowed on Indian bourses. Reports have suggested that over 40% of all trades are done by computers on NSE and BSE. Add to it the other dangerous fact - that FIIs that invest "hot money" that can fly out of the country in seconds account for over 70% of all floating stock (ie, stock that gets traded on the bourses).  See this in juxtaposition with the often displayed behaviour of FII fund managers who, like a herd of sheep, make a beeline for the two exits (NSE and BSE) for their investments at the merest sniff of danger anywhere in the world (even if it does not endanger their holdings in India), and it becomes clear that we have set up our bourses for spectacular volatility where securities' prices falling off a cliff in minutes will become sickeningly regular occurrences.

Not a good time for any stock market

.

Airline and automobile industry have always been GDP multipliers. That is because of the huge direct and indirect employment they generate, both upstream (component and ancillaries manufacture, assembly, services) and downstream (sales, service/ maintenance, spares, travel and tourism) besides the airline manufacturers and operators themselves. When any of these industries get hit, the economy gets multiple hits.

Of the two, the airline industry is more vulnerable to random hits, because of the global nature of their operations. Not only are they buffeted by almost every risk there is, including terrorism, hijacking, fuel price and availability risk, currency fluctuation/market volatility risks, political and taxation-related risks, etc., but they are also vulnerable to Mother Nature – sudden “clear air turbulence”, volcanic ash, storms, lightning and bird strikes, storms, besides risks arising out of mechanical, electrical, hydraulic and electronic failures, Air Traffic Controllers' errors, pilot error, irate governments who impound planes to score political points, militant cabin crew and pilot unions, irate customers demanding refunds and free accommodation, careless loaders, .... the list is endless. There is no other industry I can think of, that has such a profusion of risks to contend with every single day. Of course, the insurance industry is a close second.

The automobile industry is already doing very badly in all countries save China and India, thanks to the 2008-9 meltdown and recession, and these two markets are becoming hyper-competitive, thinning the margins and making the business environment even more difficult for all players.

When both these industries are doing badly, it is well nigh impossible for any economy to grow, especially in developed countries where markets are already very developed, saturated and competitive. Add to this fiscal profligacy of successive governments and you have a great recipe for financial disaster. This is what Europe and the Euro area is facing today.

With growth rates of all these economies being in the low single digits where positive, and negative in most places, it does not take much to knock an economy, and by extension, due to globalization, an entire region, off-balance. The recent volcanic ash episodes have paralyzed much of Europe, especially the UK for upto a week. Given that a week is almost 2% of a year, loss of such a level of business more than once in a year is a luxury that any European country can ill-afford. We are already into the second bout of airport and airspace closures, and Katla, the bigger next-door volcano, has yet to erupt! Add to it the cost and turmoil of elections (in the UK), fiscal profligacy (Greece, Spain and Portugal) and strikes and unrest (Greece) and it would be a very credulous person who would bet on the European economy growing over the next two years.

Because of the very interconnected nature of markets, it takes seconds, not years, for any contagion, whether of optimism or pessimism, to travel across the globe. So brace yourself for stock market failures. This contagion will definitely travel to India, for no mistake of it own, except Indian markets' connectedness with world markets and contagiousness of investor sentiment. 

.